What Comes First: Deemed Trusts or Court-Ordered Super Priority Charges? ABCA Weighs In
September 3, 2019
On August 29, 2019, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. The majority – Justice P. Rowbotham and Justice F. Schutz – upheld the chambers judge’s ruling that the Crown’s interest under deemed statutory trust provisions of the Income Tax Act (ITA), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), and Employment Insurance Act (EIA) is not a proprietary interest, but rather, is akin to that of a secured creditor. As such, subsections 11.2, 11.51 and 11.52 of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) allow the court to grant priority to charges necessary for restructuring ahead of the Crown’s security interest arising out of the statutory deemed trusts under the ITA, CPP and EIA.
This decision affirms that a deemed trust in favour of the Canada Revenue Agency for unremitted source deductions can be primed by court-ordered charges such as a charge securing debtor-in-possession financing granted in a proceeding under the CCAA.
Justice Wakeling provided a lengthy dissent and maintained that the Crown has a claim to a deemed trust created under the ITA that supersedes any claim by those holding priming charges under the CCAA. He further concluded that nothing in the CCAA is inconsistent with this determination, and expressly called Parliament to act if it finds the decision to accord first priority to the Crown in the ITA was unwise and should be reversed.
For further information, please contact:
Posted in: Restructuring & Insolvency
Blakes and Blakes Business Class communications are intended for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or an opinion on any issue.
We would be pleased to provide additional details or advice about specific situations if desired.
For permission to reprint articles, please contact the Blakes Client Relations & Marketing Department at email@example.com. © 2019 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP